🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies represent an grave threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge facing the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Growth Divide Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. Over this time, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about half of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

The growing disparity stems from stronger efficiency gains in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The scene of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, versus only fourteen in Europe.

This gap prompts a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does Europe stand? Experts widely agree it is essentially a two-horse race between the US and China, with European nations starting at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can introduce a product under one set of laws to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is split among twenty-seven different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically met with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for hope. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to advance serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

Given appropriate incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths could support far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses significant strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not become the leader in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.