🔗 Share this article

A surprising contact on LinkedIn. A proposal of work from a recruiter, probably a young woman, based in the Asian nation. The opportunity to earn perhaps £20,000 on the side writing a handful of geopolitical reports for a Chinese company containing “non-public” or privileged insights. Compensation in digital currency or physical money preferred.

It might appear clear, on this telling, that something about this approach would be amiss. However, China’s powerful Ministry of State Security continues to view it valuable to deploy recruitment consultants to try it – prompting the domestic spy agency to issue multiple warnings about their operations online.

Massive Contact Attempts on Social Media

Last year, MI5 chief Ken McCallum said Chinese agents were contacting UK citizens on LinkedIn on an extraordinary level, at a frequency of 10,000 over the preceding 30-month period, attempting to obtain governmental, commercial, military and scientific secrets. But a new initiative targeting elected officials and parliament has prompted the spy agency to act again.

A spying alert was issued on this week via the offices of the Commons speaker and his Lords counterpart: a brief presentation after the repeated efforts of certain individuals and other operatives to contact MPs, lords, their assistants, economists, thinktanks – anybody who might become a source.

Intelligence Strategy and Legislative Changes

In the typical style of British intelligence, there was no publication of the security advice from the agency or the interior ministry. Yet the service was aware its briefing note would leak once it was sent electronically out to Westminster. Republishing it in the media assists the wider public more easily recognize communications with a fraudulent purpose.

This warning has the effect of uncovering additional details from in and around Westminster, though that is not the agency's primary purpose. The service aims for public figures to understand that simply because exchanges on LinkedIn are less overtly risky as on other social platforms, it does not mean they are without risk.

Nor is domestic spy agency understood to have been responding to any specific incident in the legislature, although the burst of activity does come after the embarrassing collapse of the legal case of a former parliamentary aide Christopher Cash and his friend Christopher Berry on a technicality earlier in the autumn.

The two had been charged of working for the foreign power – a allegation they rejected – but inability to complete a prosecution under the now repealed previous legislation led to warnings that the UK's political system had been insufficiently defended.

Revised Laws and Beijing's Long-Term Interests

Legislation has now been changed, and the MI5 slide includes a reminder of its replacement: “Individuals involved in spying operations risk substantial legal consequences under the new security law.” This constitutes a criminal offense if somebody participates in behavior that could potentially “significantly help a foreign intelligence service”.

A natural inquiry, though, is what Beijing has to gain. A politician who is not a government minister will have restricted knowledge of sensitive information, and an associate of theirs even less. But Beijing is particularly focused in the legislative body: for a period, in 2020 and 2021, the UK’s approach to China on matters such as the telecom firm or the human rights situation or genocide was being influenced by parliamentarians.

Cultural Variations and Persistent Digital Risks

In part there are cultural differences as well. Authoritarian governments like China’s export information gathering techniques and the scale of its spy network is vast, employing three hundred thousand people. Chris Inglis, a American cybersecurity head under the US administration, said it was occasionally assessed that “China have greater linguistic capacity engaged in this than we [western intelligence] have English speakers”.

The Chinese government is prepared to cultivate people over the extended period and at times even the intelligence services have struggled to distinguish between genuine connections and espionage. “Beijing has a low threshold for which details is deemed to be useful,” the minister responsible Dan Jarvis informed MPs on this week, but a sudden turn in the government situation may mean someone rapidly peripheral turning significant.

Another way to think about the continuous efforts at secret intelligence collection is in the wider context of the geopolitical contest between China and the west at a threshold below the point of outright war. The nation has increased its cyber operations, with the Salt Typhoon penetration of phone and data networks in numerous nations, and the another operation breach of millions connected equipment.

Beijing is engaged in persistent attempts to find secret informants on UK politics online because it seeks to be challenging, to display power and because it has the capability.